Jump to content


Photo

Wow! MEM beats CHI!


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   grizz4life

grizz4life

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 112 posts

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:15 PM

Your thoughts? That's quite the milestone, considering we're weaker!
Posted Image
Posted Image

#2 ONLINE   Swish

Swish

    ***NBA IN MTL***

  • HN Members
  • 33,834 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:15 PM

WOW Rose wasn't playing and Boozer was shit!!!!
  • danzer1594 likes this

demar_derozan_signature_by_egbdesign-d4z


#3 OFFLINE   Frosty

Frosty

    #LilPipeGang

  • HN Members
  • 23,822 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:15 PM

[expletive deleted]

PPOuHgy.png

Rog: And niggas were surprised he busted


#4 OFFLINE   LikeABosh

LikeABosh

    Chicano

  • HN Members
  • 32,963 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:17 PM

there best player wasnt playing so cant blame them

29805413-funny-.gif

bImpO.gif


#5 ONLINE   Mirrors

Mirrors

    BACK TO BACK

  • HN Members
  • 12,407 posts

  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:18 PM

With Rose out, Rudy and Conley took over.

                                              tumblr_mnupigq6Rv1r98qz6o1_500.gif

                                                                                     My YouTube Channel


#6 OFFLINE   grizz4life

grizz4life

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 112 posts

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:38 PM

No rose though, I guess that's true.
Posted Image
Posted Image

#7 OFFLINE   zetch

zetch

    Rookie

  • HN Members
  • 127 posts

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:39 PM

85 of Memphis' 102 points came from their starting 5. Chicago's production from their starters (without Rose facilitating the offense of course) accumulated a mere 49 points. Pretty impressive when you consider the 40 point stomping Memphis took only 2 weeks prior. I guess you have to ask, does Rose have that big of an impact on the court, or is this the result of an off night for Chicago?
  • Tony Hoops likes this

#8 OFFLINE   masterpiece

masterpiece

    Most Valuable Member

  • HN Members
  • 6,940 posts

  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:49 PM

Grizzlies is not weaker, wether there is Rose or not. Also, Grizz are missing Z-Bo so Rose out is no excuse.
  • Korv likes this

Posted Image

Posted Image

H-N Mixx-Team founder
My channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/lfmike


#9 OFFLINE   DaRealJake

DaRealJake

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 219 posts

Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:49 PM

It would've been different if Rose played.

#10 OFFLINE   grizz4life

grizz4life

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 112 posts

Posted 16 January 2012 - 08:06 PM

Chicago may rely on Rose too much.
Posted Image
Posted Image

#11 OFFLINE   danzer1594

danzer1594

    All-Star

  • Members
  • 1,425 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:28 PM

Without ROse

#12 OFFLINE   Truth34

Truth34

    Red Sox

  • HN Members
  • 17,651 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 20 January 2012 - 07:32 PM

Yall don't realize Rose wouldnt really help the Bulls defense very much, of course he would make a big offensive difference but the Grizzlies offense was the same

roindotip.gifrondop2.gif


#13 OFFLINE   Airmax

Airmax

    HoopsNationTV Crew

  • HN Members
  • 4,086 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:04 AM

Well its natural that you rely on hte point guard a lot. Since he makes the plays, and is there best player.

HoopsNationTV Crew


#14 OFFLINE   Korv

Korv

    T.I.'s #1 Stan

  • HN Journalists
  • 13,625 posts


  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 08 August 2012 - 04:20 PM

WOW Rose wasn't playing and Boozer was shit!!!!

LOL Boozer is shit

Posted Image

Posted Image

https://twitter.com/SachaMelki , Follow Swish on Twitter





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users