Solid NBA players team:
PF: Al Jefferson
SF: Josh Smith
C : Tyson Chandler
SG: Jamal Crawford
PG: Raymond Felton
Reserves:
PF: Kris Humphries
SF: Dorrell Wright
C : Spencer Hawes
SG: JR Smith
PG: Kirk Hinrich
All star team:
PF: Lamarcus Aldridge
SF: Danny Granger
C : Roy Hibbert
SG: Andre Igudola
PG: Mo Williams
Reserves:
PF: Carlos Boozer
SF: Gerald Wallace
C : Amare Stoudamire ( Plays center sometimes)
SG: Vince Carter ( Yes the VC at his current status in a mavs jersey)
PG: Jameer Nelson
NOTE: I know players from the "Solid NBA team" can still be at all star status , but as their getting older and new prospects are getting better. It's going to be hard for them to get selected. Some of those players from the "solid" team are at all star level, but unfortunatly they never got selected.
Which team is better in your opinion the "all star team" or "Solid NBA players team"
Started by
AVID
, Dec 11 2012 12:54 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
ONLINE
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 11 December 2012 - 01:04 PM
Solid NBA players would win. The All-stars aren't even that good those were literally the worst all-stars you could choose.
#3
ONLINE
Posted 11 December 2012 - 01:08 PM
Solid NBa players team is way better.

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#4
ONLINE
Posted 11 December 2012 - 01:18 PM
The way how they're playing right now, is easily take the Solid Players team because of the way how Crawford Smith and Felton are playing. Jefferson and Smith are also two borderline All Stars and Chandler can protect the paint extremely well.

#5
ONLINE
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:43 PM
All-Star teams are overrated.
And the Solid team would win I think.
And the Solid team would win I think.
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:48 PM
Pointless thread is pointless.

Atlanta Hawks 2nd overall pick in the 2000 draft: Michael Redd
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














