Do you all agree?
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:27 PM
Because: They never left their team. They PLAMTED their seed and took their team to glory.
James left to another team. Therefore he and Shaq belong in the same class.
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:30 PM
Its not really an argument for LeBron being better than any of the GOATs, but it is an argument that his decision should not penalize his amazing career.
- Rio is G.O.A.T likes this

#3
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:45 PM
But I'll always attach a personal asterisk to his legacy for how he joined forces with Wade and Bosh & how he went about doing so. When LeBron finally won the title it didn't really phase me, my reaction was pretty blank. I felt he should've won it the year before that.

#4
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:06 PM

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:12 PM
No. Well he will never be greater than Jordan, Kareem, Bill Russell, Magic, Wilt, Or Bird, but everybody else he can be better than. Those players he will not touch. Big he will definitely be considered greater than Kobe when it's all said and done.
Why not? Seriously why not. Jordan didnt win a single ring until he was 28.
LeBron won one at 28. Why cant he do what Jordan did?
- Young Gee likes this

#6
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:14 PM
I think he could pass Larry and Russell, there's a chance he could be up there with Kareem and Jordan tooNo. Well he will never be greater than Jordan, Kareem, Bill Russell, Magic, Wilt, Or Bird, but everybody else he can be better than. Those players he will not touch. Big he will definitely be considered greater than Kobe when it's all said and done.

#7
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:15 PM
None of those reasons are why he isn't among the greats.LeBron James will never catch Bryant, Jordan, Bird, Magic or all the other greats.
Because: They never left their team. They PLAMTED their seed and took their team to glory.
James left to another team. Therefore he and Shaq belong in the same class.
End results trump pretty numbers.
LeBron got killed by the Spurs his first trip. Bruce Bowen housed him in the Finals. He choked in the Finals versus Dallas... not one game... but arguably 5 of the 6.
He finally won while getting lit up by Durant and a Thunder team that was inexperienced at the biggest stage. Harden and Ibaka both got tight nuts and Coach Brooks really showed his flaws as a coach.
I respect LeBron, but you can't place him anywhere (respectively of course in the top 10) until his career is done with. Seriously... he won a title. One. He has plenty left to turn peoples opinion of his legacy.
He's a fantastic player, but so many people disregard the players ahead of him... that's just insulting to the game.
- Rog, Costel and Void like this

R.I.P. MARTY BLAKE March 22, 1927 – April 7, 2013
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:21 PM
Ok, MAYBE Larry Bird, but I highly doubt it. Larry was a better rebounder, passer, defender, shooter, and more clutch than Lebron. Lebron is more athletic, and a better finisher at the rack, but he's nog better by MUCH at anything except athleticism. Lets not forget Larry did average close to 30/10 before. For his career he averaged 24/10/6/50% FG/ 88% FT/37% 3 pointers. If Lebron gets 3 rings, 3 MVP's and 2 finals MVP's, and averages those historical stats for his career, then we can talk.I think he could pass Larry and Russell, there's a chance he could be up there with Kareem and Jordan too

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#9
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:22 PM
lol.. Bird and Russell?I think he could pass Larry and Russell, there's a chance he could be up there with Kareem and Jordan too
Hell no

"That's kicking someone in the balls in their heart" - A wise man full of knowledge, wisdom, and intelligence
#10
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:24 PM
Yea I know I geuss I shoulda said maybe pass him, I agree with you some people try to make it seem LBJ can pass him with another ring or something.Ok, MAYBE Larry Bird, but I highly doubt it. Larry was a better rebounder, passer, defender, shooter, and more clutch than Lebron. Lebron is more athletic, and a better finisher at the rack, but he's nog better by MUCH at anything except athleticism. Lets not forget Larry did average 30/10 before
How is that impossible? The dude is a great player.lol.. Bird and Russell?
Hell no

#11
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:28 PM
read what I added to my post.Yea I know I geuss I shoulda said maybe pass him, I agree with you some people try to make it seem LBJ can pass him with another ring or something.
How is that impossible? The dude is a great player.

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:30 PM
How can't he surpass Bird? They both have 2 MVPs. Bird just has 2 more titles and on one he isn't FMVP. LeBron has a lot of time.lol.. Bird and Russell?
Hell no
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:30 PM

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#14
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:30 PM
Ok I said he COULD. I'm not one of those people living in the moment thinking he's top 10 or anything because IMO he's not even that clost to Shaq yet.read what I added to my post.

#15
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:30 PM
bird had 3 MVP's. so does Lebron.Um, no?
How can't he surpass Bird? They both have 2 MVPs. Bird just has 2 more titles and on one he isn't FMVP. LeBron has a lot of time.

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#16
ONLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:30 PM

#17
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:31 PM

HNL: Nuggets GM. Two Time HNL Champion
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:33 PM
Both have three MVPs.How can't he surpass Bird? They both have 2 MVPs. Bird just has 2 more titles and on one he isn't FMVP. LeBron has a lot of time.
- Pusha Key likes this

HNL Boston Celtics: 29-23
#19
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:38 PM
In thid day and age with more athletic and stronger big men and forwards, Bird wouldn't be the rebounder he was back in the 80s. Imo a case can be made against Bird for rebounding, passing, and defense. We all know Bird was a better shooter and that what most players have on LeBron when compared, but it doesn't change much. Saying LeBron isn't better at anything except athleticism is plain wrong. Just imagine if LeBron played in the 80s with Bird, something like 35/13/9... you've gotta take era into consideration before you talk straight stats.Ok, MAYBE Larry Bird, but I highly doubt it. Larry was a better rebounder, passer, defender, shooter, and more clutch than Lebron. Lebron is more athletic, and a better finisher at the rack, but he's nog better by MUCH at anything except athleticism. Lets not forget Larry did average close to 30/10 before. For his career he averaged 24/10/6/50% FG/ 88% FT/37% 3 pointers. If Lebron gets 3 rings, 3 MVP's and 2 finals MVP's, and averages those historical stats for his career, then we can talk.
Typo.bird had 3 MVP's. so does Lebron.
Typo.Both have three MVPs.
Imo the only people LeBron has absolutely no chance of passing are MJ and Magic.
#20
OFFLINE
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:41 PM
So he can pass Kareem and will finish ahead of Kobe? I somewhat agree with you, and I do think he can be the greatest of all-time, but I still think he'll only finish in the top five.Imo the only people LeBron has absolutely no chance of passing are MJ and Magic.

HNL Boston Celtics: 29-23
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














