Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Is this season the proof that shooting lots of 3s works

32 posts in this topic

Posted

Here are the teams that exceeded expectations the most so far:

NY Knicks

GS Warriors

Atlanta Hawks

These 3 teams have something in common, they take a lot of threes. Even though it doesnt seem like it, 3s are highly effective. Shooting 40% from 3 is equivalent to shooting 60% from 2.

Do you feel every teams should attempt a lot of threes like NY, GS, ATL and the 2011-12 Miami Heat or even the Spurs, it seems to be working just fine?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well.. it is if you have dead-eye shooters on your team like Curry and Thompson..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't believe they should jack up threes.I believe they should take good threes and try to make them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The first second your team hits a shooting slump during the game, that whole "Shoot a lot of 3s" mentality will literally kill you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Believe it or not none of these teams are in the top 5 for 3pm per game. I wouldnt say any of these teams really rely on threes. Warriors but 4th in the NBA in rebounds and play great D, and New York has the best turnover ratio in the league, they play smart with the ball. There are a lot of factors for why each team is succeeding.

Each team has players with good inside precense: Lee, Horford, and Chandler, so they can get a lot of post scoring and mainly pick n roll with chandler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

as long as they are good open looks at 3's then yes it's always good to shoot em

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I mean it's definitely an interesting strategy. If you can shoot 40%+, it's a great strategy. But it won't work out like that in the playoffs. You can't just rely on 3 pointers to win you games. No matter who you are, you're going to have off nights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nah. It's been proven for the shooting 3's theory can get you very far. Look at the Magic from like '09 to '12. They relied a lot on their three point shooting and got the Finals once and made the Conference Finals once. Also the Spurs have used it for a number of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well yeah, as long as there is another form of scoring you can rely on. If jacking up contested threes is what your gameplan is, then you will lose when you're cold. Good/open three shooting has always been a viable option though.

WTAP likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

All teams have solid three point shooters though. Novak, Kidd, even Melo on the Knicks. There's Lou Williams and Kyle Korver on the Hawks. Don't even get me started on the Warriors. For most teams, shooting threes wouldn't work, but for these teams it's one of their main strategies.

Wtf tags?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think that they cant get so far.one day those 3s will stop falling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't believe they should jack up threes.I believe they should take good threes and try to make them.

This is what the Knicks are doing better than anyone in my opinion. We have screens that screen the screens on our screens and our ball movement this year is excellent. Our team as a whole is so good from 3 that we can decoy Steve Novak just because of the amount of attention he draws and when they overplay him or Melo they just kick it out. I can't wait to see what happens when Amar'e comes back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The first second your team hits a shooting slump during the game, that whole "Shoot a lot of 3s" mentality will literally kill you.

No, it won't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Believe it or not none of these teams are in the top 5 for 3pm per game. I wouldnt say any of these teams really rely on threes. Warriors but 4th in the NBA in rebounds and play great D, and New York has the best turnover ratio in the league, they play smart with the ball. There are a lot of factors for why each team is succeeding.

Each team has players with good inside precense: Lee, Horford, and Chandler, so they can get a lot of post scoring and mainly pick n roll with chandler.

But these teams are amonfst the best in 3pt %

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Knicks has used the threes a lot. They have 8 players that can knock down threes. Even Rasheed Wallace...They take high percentage shots. That is their advantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The 2009 Magic were a better proof!

Basing your game too much on 3s might hurt you many times but if you hit them, you got great chances of winning.

If I had a team, I wouldn't base too much there.

The best strategy is feeding your bigs (if they're capable) being the first option IMO. You have to go for the higher percentage shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You live by it but also you die by it. Come playoffs time it's gonna be different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Here are the teams that exceeded expectations the most so far:

NY Knicks

GS Warriors

Atlanta Hawks

These 3 teams have something in common, they take a lot of threes. Even though it doesnt seem like it, 3s are highly effective. Shooting 40% from 3 is equivalent to shooting 60% from 2.

Do you feel every teams should attempt a lot of threes like NY, GS, ATL and the 2011-12 Miami Heat or even the Spurs, it seems to be working just fine?

IMO this only works if you have the right personal. Right now there are only 3 teams averaging 40% of higher from 3 and the league average is 35.7%. It's also a risky proposition because a cold streak in the playoffs would = doom. If you have a strong rebounder and 3-4 very good 3pt shooters then it's a module to try and emulate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

IMO this only works if you have the right personal. Right now there are only 3 teams averaging 40% of higher from 3 and the league average is 35.7%. It's also a risky proposition because a cold streak in the playoffs would = doom. If you have a strong rebounder and 3-4 very good 3pt shooters then it's a module to try and emulate.

The Cavaliers (LBJ era) and Orlando (Dwight era) tried this. There were several flaws in those attempts though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

both made the finals though and with a team many thought wasn't a finals team... didn't say it was a clear cut way to win the title.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

IMO this only works if you have the right personal. Right now there are only 3 teams averaging 40% of higher from 3 and the league average is 35.7%. It's also a risky proposition because a cold streak in the playoffs would = doom. If you have a strong rebounder and 3-4 very good 3pt shooters then it's a module to try and emulate.

The league average of 35.7% from three is still more efficient than shooting 50% from 2. I feel trams should try to look at shooters more than at big guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wtf tags?

What? Like you've never been to gaypornhouse. Don't lie dawg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.