James Harden vs Dwyane Wade?
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:06 PM
#2
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:15 PM
Wade's above the 50% mark, and their other stats look very similar. The factor here, was knowing Wade has taken the second fiddle option, while Harden has actually become the first, on a worse team. Naturally, Harden is playing 38 minutes a game while Wade is clocking in 33 and producing more or less what Harden is, but with less shots taken.

#3
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:21 PM
Yeah, I say that Wade is still better. Dante's post basically summed up everything I was gonna say.I don't think I'm being bias when I say still Dwyane Wade. Harden's scoring on higher volume, but not with more efficiency, as he's only shooting 45%.
Wade's above the 50% mark, and their other stats look very similar. The factor here, was knowing Wade has taken the second fiddle option, while Harden has actually become the first, on a worse team. Naturally, Harden is playing 38 minutes a game while Wade is clocking in 33 and producing more or less what Harden is, but with less shots taken.
- Dante likes this

HNL Boston Celtics: 30-31
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:21 PM
I'll still take Wade.
- Jan_Sobieski™ likes this

R.I.P. MARTY BLAKE March 22, 1927 – April 7, 2013
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:21 PM
Harden 24.2pts, 4.2 rebs, 5 asts, .604TS%
Statistically it's Harden, as he scores more points, more efficiently, assists equally with poorer teammates and rebounds just as well. In the past, i would give it to Wade because he plays better defense but his defense is terrible this season so I give it to Harden
Jamal Crawford, Marshon Brooks, Leandro Barbosa, Ray Allen, LeBron James, Chris Paul, Gordon Hayward, Jonas Valanciunas
#6
OFFLINE
#7
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:26 PM
I'd like to see those stats with Harden playing with Lebron and Bosh.Per 36: Wade 22.1 pts, 4.6 rebs, 5 asts, .579 TS%,
Harden 24.2pts, 4.2 rebs, 5 asts, .604TS%
Statistically it's Harden, as he scores more points, more efficiently, assists equally with poorer teammates and rebounds just as well. In the past, i would give it to Wade because he plays better defense but his defense is terrible this season so I give it to Harden
- The Logo, Dante, Dwyane wheezY™ and 1 other like this


#8
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:30 PM
Just look last year when he played with Westbrook and Durant...I'd like to see those stats with Harden playing with Lebron and Bosh.
Rounding up.... 17pts 4rebs 4 ast.
I'm not knocking Harden, but I think that Wade not being 100% and 7 years older is the only thing that makes this even debatable.
- Costel and airWarrior like this

R.I.P. MARTY BLAKE March 22, 1927 – April 7, 2013
#9
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:31 PM
The TS% would go tgrough the roofI'd like to see those stats with Harden playing with Lebron and Bosh.
Jamal Crawford, Marshon Brooks, Leandro Barbosa, Ray Allen, LeBron James, Chris Paul, Gordon Hayward, Jonas Valanciunas
#10
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:33 PM
#11
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:34 PM
Who caresThe TS% would go tgrough the roof
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics/_/sort/trueShootingPct
Doesn't say much about the overall game of the player


#12
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:40 PM
As for the heat they play a offense based around James more than they would rely on Wade .


"I'm Indubitable, spitting Pharmaceuticals All I do is win, ties are simply unsuitable"
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:48 PM
Dwyane Wade has a lower usage rate than James Harden and is still putting up around the same numbers.Who cares
http://insider.espn....trueShootingPct
Doesn't say much about the overall game of the player

HNL Boston Celtics: 30-31
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:51 PM
Its the ultimate way of calculating efficiency (3pts and FT% are included), Harden scores more points, more efficiently, assists as much even if he plays with acrubs and plays better D.Who cares
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics/_/sort/trueShootingPct
Doesn't say much about the overall game of the player
Jamal Crawford, Marshon Brooks, Leandro Barbosa, Ray Allen, LeBron James, Chris Paul, Gordon Hayward, Jonas Valanciunas
#15
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:10 PM
Which is why Wade is betterDwyane Wade has a lower usage rate than James Harden and is still putting up around the same numbers.
Of course if you play with scrubs you are going to get more points assists, ect. Those numbers would decrease with playing with Lebron and Bosh if he and Wade switched places.Its the ultimate way of calculating efficiency (3pts and FT% are included), Harden scores more points, more efficiently, assists as much even if he plays with scrubs and plays better D.
His efficiency wouldn't really change significantly no matter who he plays with, only his totals.


#16
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:11 PM
Why wouldnt his efficiency go up if the other numbers go down, you don't make senseWhich is why Wade is better
Of course if you play with scrubs you are going to get more points assists, ect. Those numbers would decrease with playing with Lebron and Bosh if he and Wade switched places.
His efficiency wouldn't really change significantly no matter who he plays with, only his totals.
Jamal Crawford, Marshon Brooks, Leandro Barbosa, Ray Allen, LeBron James, Chris Paul, Gordon Hayward, Jonas Valanciunas
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:15 PM
#18
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:17 PM
Dude..Why wouldnt his efficiency go up if the other numbers go down, you don't make sense
Because totals have nothing to do with efficiency.
Hypothetical:
10/20 = 50%fg 20 points
5/10=50%fg 10 points
Same efficiency
Harden would have much less shot attempts and other stat totals on the Heat. Efficiency wouldn't necessarily decrease.
Harden's TS% is barely different from last year, but his numbers this year are much metter.


#19
OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:22 PM
That's what I was trying to prove...Which is why Wade is better

HNL Boston Celtics: 30-31
#20
ONLINE
Posted 27 December 2012 - 01:22 PM

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















