Is Player Efficiency Rating(PER) Legit??
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:09 AM
*For example, if being a top player was mostly based on PER, then Chris Paul is by far the best point guard ever, Dirk Nowitzki is better than Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade is the 6th best player ever, LeBron James is better than Kareem, and Wilt and Magic Johnson and Shaq is a top 3 player ever and better than Wilt, Kareem, and Hakeem.
Also, if we are talking about today, then based on PER, Brook Lopez is a top 5 NBA Player.
And if everything was based on PER, then LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Paul, Tim Duncan, Davis Robinson, Bob Petit, and Charles Barkley are all better than Kareem Abdul Jabar.
(And most everyone has Kareem as the best ever or the 2nd or 3rd best player ever)
**Also, if PER is an efficiency stat, then why is Steve Nash's career PER only at 20 even though Nash is one of the most efficient players ever and the only player to average 50/40/90 for his career?
**Also if that is the case then Larry Bird is tied with Kobe Bryant for being the 18th best player ever. And Larry Bird is a no doubt top 10 player ever, along with Kobe Bryant. Many even have Larry Bird in their top 5. And Larry Bird had some amazing all around statistical seasons and has 3 championship rings and was probably the best player of his generation(it pains me to say that as a Laker fan)
**Also, while Kevin Garnett is a great player, top 25 without a doubt, his highest PER season was almost 30 (29.5) and Kobe Bryant who is a no doubt top 10 player has a highest PER season of 28..
**Me personally, I believe that PER is a stat that works for and benefits certain players, but it is not close to being the most reliable stat in the world.. Becuase players can have amazing major/basic stats (points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks), but have a lower PER than a guy with stats not close to their level...
That is the case with Larry Bird, and the case with Kobe Bryant this season
and years past... Kobe is putting up great individual stats this season, yet he trails CP3 by about 1 in PER and CP3 is not putting up close to what Kobe is putting up individually
CP3: 17ppg, 9.3asts, 3stls, 48%FG
Kobe: 30.3ppg, 5.3reb, 5ast, 1.5stl, 48%FG
And Larry Bird has had some 28ppg+, 10+rpg, 8apg seasons and is tied for the 18th best PER ever.
And Bird has had mostly 25ppg, 9rpg, 8apg seasons his entire career.
**WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK ABOUT PER??
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:40 AM
Also PER always diminishes as a player ages so guys who had long careers but were not longer able to put up superstar numbers but were able to contribute to the teams success (Kareem being a prime example) it hurts their career averages.
And yes I think the stat is somewhat flawed because of your Steve Nash example. Nash is not a volume scorer, he doesn't put up many shots and doesn't look to average 20+ppg... very much like John Stockton and because of how PER is calculated it hurts him... which is absurd given how efficiently he scores and takes care of the ball.
Having said that, it is still a good quick way to see how well a player is play for a particular year.
- Bball_Jones and The Logo like this
Posted 04 January 2013 - 04:15 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:39 PM
Charles Barkley PER 1991: 29
Shaq easily top 3....however, his PER is low. not sure how Oscar Robertson top 5 league in almost every category (ppg, apg, rpg, FG%, FT%) is lower then Yao Ming, larry bird 86 behind yao ming, john drew...
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:27 PM
I thought I'd probably die in prison, expensive taste in women ain't had no pot to piss in, now my kitchen full of dishes
Nose bloody from that sniffin', yo heroin addiction, Trigga finga itchin' f*ck parental supervision- A$AP Rocky
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users