Bargs: I guess big contract, injury prone, soft, dont rebound for a 7ft
Stoud: HUGE contract, injury problems
Both seemingly are in the same boat, like no team wants them.
Both players however can be 20pt scorers in the right setting, Amare could be a 18/10 type player.
Also, Knicks shopped Amare to EVERY team in the NBA last season and no one wanted him so..
Who has more trade value: Bargnani or Stoudemire?
Started by
TheJamMasterJ
, Jan 04 2013 05:56 PM
17 replies to this topic
#1
OFFLINE
#2
OFFLINE
WrongIslander 2.0
-
- HN Members
-
- 5,796 posts
Detroit Lions - Inventing new ways to lose since 1994
-
-
Country:
Posted 04 January 2013 - 05:57 PM
Stat has far more value.
Atlanta Hawks 2nd overall pick in the 2000 draft: Michael Redd
#3
OFFLINE
#4
ONLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:00 PM
Bargs sucks
Season 1: 55-27 ~ Season 2: 52-30 ~ Season 3: 52-30 ~ Season 4: 62-20 ~ Season 5: 55-15
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:07 PM
Bargani = Sh*t player, Sh*t contract
Stoudemire = Good player, Sh*t contract
Stoudemire Easily
Stoudemire = Good player, Sh*t contract
Stoudemire Easily
Shabazz Muhammad 2013
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:09 PM
Amare was shopped to every team in the NBA and nobody wanted him at least Bargs drew interest from a couple teams. Doesnt sound like trade value to me.
- Jan_Sobieski™ likes this
#7
OFFLINE
WrongIslander 2.0
-
- HN Members
-
- 5,796 posts
Detroit Lions - Inventing new ways to lose since 1994
-
-
Country:
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:10 PM
This can of tuna:
- Way Of Nash likes this
Atlanta Hawks 2nd overall pick in the 2000 draft: Michael Redd
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:15 PM
how about neither has any?
knicks offered amare for free and nobody wanted him
bargs sucks and raps play better without him...nobody wants him
knicks offered amare for free and nobody wanted him
bargs sucks and raps play better without him...nobody wants him
#9
OFFLINE
WrongIslander 2.0
-
- HN Members
-
- 5,796 posts
Detroit Lions - Inventing new ways to lose since 1994
-
-
Country:
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:20 PM
how about neither has any?
knicks offered amare for free and nobody wanted him
bargs sucks and raps play better without him...nobody wants him
Your name reminds me of "The Wire"
Atlanta Hawks 2nd overall pick in the 2000 draft: Michael Redd
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:23 PM
Your name reminds me of "The Wire"
i got it from roses tat
#11
OFFLINE
WrongIslander 2.0
-
- HN Members
-
- 5,796 posts
Detroit Lions - Inventing new ways to lose since 1994
-
-
Country:
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:24 PM
i got it from roses tat
Crazy that like.
Atlanta Hawks 2nd overall pick in the 2000 draft: Michael Redd
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:37 PM
how about neither has any?
knicks offered amare for free and nobody wanted him
bargs sucks and raps play better without him...nobody wants him
This.
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:46 PM
Barg does because hes younger imo
Bargnani has been placed in trade scenarios so that makes me think some teams have interest in him
Bargnani has been placed in trade scenarios so that makes me think some teams have interest in him
- TheJamMasterJ likes this
#14
ONLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:32 PM
If you make it albacore tuna I'll give you Gasol.This can of tuna:
R.I.P. MARTY BLAKE March 22, 1927 – April 7, 2013
#15
ONLINE
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:38 PM
Just depends on the team really.
Amar'e would be huge for Boston.
Bargs would be good for SAS.
But those contracts are ug-o-lee.
It would have to be a dumb team or a team that wants to dump a crappy contract of their own.
Of the two Bargs is probably easier to fit in, younger and less ego driven.
Amar'e would be huge for Boston.
Bargs would be good for SAS.
But those contracts are ug-o-lee.
It would have to be a dumb team or a team that wants to dump a crappy contract of their own.
Of the two Bargs is probably easier to fit in, younger and less ego driven.
R.I.P. MARTY BLAKE March 22, 1927 – April 7, 2013
#16
OFFLINE
Posted 05 January 2013 - 07:48 AM
Brags is younger, less injury problems and on a less expensive contract. 20 points a game before and 7'0. More value than stoudemire who no one wanted but Bargs is still worse that Stat and garbage
- Jan_Sobieski™ likes this
#17
ONLINE
#18
ONLINE
Posted 05 January 2013 - 09:09 AM
I go with Amare slightly . Shalom. Long term though would be Bargs.
You never put a limit onto the Citizens.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
