Kings-Celtics deal almost in the works
#1
ONLINE
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:26 PM

#3
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:27 PM

#4
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:28 PM
#5
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:28 PM
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:28 PM
Rondo-Bradley-Pierce-Garnett-Cousins, but then our bench would be Leandro Barbosa, Brandon Bass, and Chris Wilcox. That bench is legit ass.

#7
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:30 PM
One more of these topics and I'm suspending myself from HN until the trade deadline has passed. This is getting fucking ridiculous. Discussion is ruined because of idiots who can't understand every single reliable source saying "This ain't happening."
- AVID likes this
"Men do not shape destiny. Destiny produces the man for the hour."
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:31 PM
No it [expletive deleted] isn't.
One more of these topics and I'm suspending myself from HN until the trade deadline has passed. This is getting [expletive deleted] ridiculous. Discussion is ruined because of idiots who can't understand every single reliable source saying "This ain't happening."
Nooo Penny

#9
OFFLINE
#10
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:36 PM
No it [expletive deleted] isn't.
One more of these topics and I'm suspending myself from HN until the trade deadline has passed. This is getting [expletive deleted] ridiculous. Discussion is ruined because of idiots who can't understand every single reliable source saying "This ain't happening."
at the end of the day it's still a rumor, just cause it's being discussed, doesn't mean it's happening. Calm down
#11
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:39 PM
Don't tell me to calm down. It's not a rumour. It's not being discussed. The discussion is the Celtics saying "Yo can we get Cuz?" and the Kings going "Heeeell naw." That's all.at the end of the day it's still a rumor, just cause it's being discussed, doesn't mean it's happening. Calm down
Yet a new one of these topics crops up every 2-3 days. It's making this forum extremely boring and tedious.
"Men do not shape destiny. Destiny produces the man for the hour."
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:41 PM
#13
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:42 PM
Don't tell me to calm down. It's not a rumour. It's not being discussed. The discussion is the Celtics saying "Yo can we get Cuz?" and the Kings going "Heeeell naw." That's all.
Yet a new one of these topics crops up every 2-3 days. It's making this forum extremely boring and tedious.
okay whatever dude
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:44 PM
#15
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:44 PM

S1: 64-18 | S2: 57-25 | S3: 69-13 | S4: 70-12
#16
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:46 PM
I don't think this is going to happen, unless Pierce leaves, which I doubt the Kings would even give up DMC for any of the Celtics' big three.
yeah Pierce has slowed down a bit as is KG, only Rondo they would be interested in but Boston would never do that
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:52 PM
No it [expletive deleted] isn't.
One more of these topics and I'm suspending myself from HN until the trade deadline has passed. This is getting [expletive deleted] ridiculous. Discussion is ruined because of idiots who can't understand every single reliable source saying "This ain't happening."
Language cowboy, language,..
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 04:56 PM
http://www.yardbarke...boston/12593473
Thoughts on this proposal?
Its a 50/50 chance of failure proposal, I don't know. Jeff Green is really good and so is Terry & their giving up a potential star in Jared Sullinger! Cousins a beast though.
#19
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 05:01 PM
but yeah "H3LL F@ckin No to that trade". I remember when Boston traded four of their young players for KG. Look what happen to Boston. They win a ring and twolves still end up with one of the worst records in the NBA and they basically traded or waived all four of the boston players they obtained. One of them was Al Jefferson.
#20
ONLINE
Posted 07 January 2013 - 06:18 PM

Current Record: #Rebuilding
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



















