When Lebron James loses His Atleticism
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:24 AM
#2
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:26 AM
LeBron's skill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vince's skill
Therefore when/if LeBron loses his athleticism I think he could still drop 20 a game.
#3
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:36 AM
The thing is, how is it possible to lose such athleticism? It's not just the leaping ability...
I think James will have the athleticism advantage for many many years.
@
At LeBron - Carter thing... no. The difference is not that big and if it wasn't for James' court vision and passing, I'd give the edge to Vince as his shooting and his versatility when it comes to scoring >> James'.
JMO.
- Elite Greatness likes this
★★★Panathinaikos BC★★★
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:42 AM
Vince Carter is still averaging 10 pts a game.
LeBron's skill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vince's skill
Therefore when/if LeBron loses his athleticism I think he could still drop 20 a game.
Just 20 I dont know about that one I believe he could still average 25 or 26 a game in his 30s he just has to keep developing his jumper unless he wants to switch to a full time point guard and Average a double double every game.
Dominate? No.
The thing is, how is it possible to lose such athleticism? It's not just the leaping ability...
I think James will have the athleticism advantage for many many years.
@
At LeBron - Carter thing... no. The difference is not that big and if it wasn't for James' court vision and passing, I'd give the edge to Vince as his shooting and his versatitility when it comes to scoring >> James'.
JMO.
He could still dominate a game its not just his scoring its his court vision and his passing abilities I could see 25/8/7
Dominate? No.
The thing is, how is it possible to lose such athleticism? It's not just the leaping ability...
I think James will have the athleticism advantage for many many years.
@
At LeBron - Carter thing... no. The difference is not that big and if it wasn't for James' court vision and passing, I'd give the edge to Vince as his shooting and his versatitility when it comes to scoring >> James'.
JMO.
And when you look at old players that lost some of their atleticism like Jordan Kobe they still were really good players
#5
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:44 AM
Then, it depends on how much of his athleticism he'll lose.He could still dominate a game its not just his scoring its his court vision and his passing abilities I could see 25/8/7
And when you look at old players that lost some of their atleticism like Jordan Kobe they still were really good players
And don't compare the offensiv repertoire of James with that of Jordan and Kobe...
25/8/7 for a LeBron without his athleticism? Lol. Those are like his current stats.
- Way Of Nash likes this
★★★Panathinaikos BC★★★
#6
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:50 AM
Let's see what he loses athletically, first, along the years, a guy like Dr. J was able to retain plenty of his athleticism in his 30's, for example.
LeBron has plenty of skill but he must keep improving in some areas if he wants to still dominate when/if he loses a good amount of athleticism.
And when you look at old players that lost some of their atleticism like Jordan Kobe they still were really good players
Yeah but those two are/were more versatile scorers, LeBron is yet to reach the level of scoring game they had in areas such as postgame, triple threat moves, jumpshooting, not saying he's bad but no on their level.
33 
#7
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:56 AM
Then, it depends on how much of his athleticism he'll lose.
And don't compare the offensiv repertoire of James with that of Jordan and Kobe...
25/8/7 for a LeBron without his athleticism? Lol. Those are like his current stats.
Yeah, let's say he loses plenty of athleticism (which I doubt it happens), he wouldn't see players sagging off affraid of his driving more than his shooting, he wouldn't draw as many double teams on his way to the basket enabling him to kick it, he wouldn't be the same beast in transition, he would've had to use more fundamentals for rebounding, he would lose defensive ability... That could hurt him in all areas of his game, sure he could still be a great player but he wouldn't dominate like he does now or close, if he didn't adapt/adjust and improve.
33 
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
Lebron deep into his 30's could still average 22/8/8 or the whereabouts. Plus a player as athletic as him will never be nonathletic.
- Ben likes this
#9
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:02 AM
LeBron's basketball IQ and ability to play multiple positions is what will set him apart from Carter. LeBron can play PG-PF, Vince can't,Dominate? No.
The thing is, how is it possible to lose such athleticism? It's not just the leaping ability...
I think James will have the athleticism advantage for many many years.
@
At LeBron - Carter thing... no. The difference is not that big and if it wasn't for James' court vision and passing, I'd give the edge to Vince as his shooting and his versatitility when it comes to scoring >> James'.
JMO.
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:04 AM
First of all I gotta athleticism isn't all about jumping, or all about speed...
Let's see what he loses athletically, first, along the years, a guy like Dr. J was able to retain plenty of his athleticism in his 30's, for example.
LeBron has plenty of skill but he must keep improving in some areas if he wants to still dominate when/if he loses a good amount of athleticism.
Yeah but those two are/were more versatile scorers, LeBron is yet to reach the level of scoring game they had in areas such as postgame, triple threat moves, jumpshooting, not saying he's bad but no on their level.
But its not all about scoring magic wasnt known for his scoring but for his passing and still dominated when he was in his 30s Offense is not just about scoring you have to also orchestrate the offense and lebron does that pretty well
#11
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:10 AM
Without his athleticism he wouldn't be able to play PF.LeBron's basketball IQ and ability to play multiple positions is what will set him apart from Carter. LeBron can play PG-PF, Vince can't,
And the fact that he can play PG is because of his court vision and passing. Something Vince didn't have. I acknowledge that.
But in terms of fundamentals, Vince > James.
- Elite Greatness likes this
★★★Panathinaikos BC★★★
#12
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:42 AM
I mean if Karl Malone, who Lebron is similar to interns of built and work ethic (both take great care of their bodies) could run the floor hard for almost 20 years, I think Lebron could be similar.
When he exsists his prime I think he can still be a 20-23 point, 7 or 8 rebound, 5-7 assists type of player (I expect his FG% to dip a few, maybe even 5 or 6 points though).
#13
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:48 AM
Those skills are directly linked with athleticism.LOL at Lebron not being an extraordinarily skilled player. He's one of the best ball-handlers, slashers, finishers, and versatile defenders in the history of the game. He's far above average as a shooter and post player as well. Not to mention court vision and basketball IQ which are passive skills.
Lebron deep into his 30's could still average 22/8/8 or the whereabouts. Plus a player as athletic as him will never be nonathletic.
★★★Panathinaikos BC★★★
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:08 PM
- credits to Ramon

.Who am I? Lord Flacko. Painting vivid pictures call me Basquiat or Picasso. Capo head hancho now my followin's colossal,
Ain't no boxer Paquiao, but chopper todo caso. - A$AP Rocky
#15
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:18 PM
Those skills are directly linked with athleticism.
No they aren't... his ability to protect the ball, maneuver around defenses, and finish acrobatically at the rim with both hands and all angles are all acquired skills. As is defensive awareness, man defense, help defense (knowing when to help?) etc.
#16
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:27 PM
Finish acrobatically? He's not Manu - he doesn't do it that often. But a part of it is hangtime which is athleticism.No they aren't... his ability to protect the ball, maneuver around defenses, and finish acrobatically at the rim with both hands and all angles are all acquired skills. As is defensive awareness, man defense, help defense (knowing when to help?) etc.
Also, man to man defense has much to do with strong legs. I don't say every aspect of defense is about athleticism.
★★★Panathinaikos BC★★★
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:27 PM
Derek Fisher has good defensive awareness and knows where to be at all times on the defensive end, but he couldn't defend a tadpole.No they aren't... his ability to protect the ball, maneuver around defenses, and finish acrobatically at the rim with both hands and all angles are all acquired skills. As is defensive awareness, man defense, help defense (knowing when to help?) etc.
Being able to maneuver around defenses relies on athleticism. When you're 33 years old, have 15 years behind you of pro-ball and weigh 260 lbs it's a lot harder than when you're 27 years old and have 9 years of pro-ball behind you. I can see him retaining that skill but not to the level it's at now.
Being able to finish with both hands at all angles are acquired skills. Being able to get to the rim in the first place and do so "acrobatically", are skills that rely on athleticism.
I see LeBron averaging around 21/6/6 on around 48% at 34.
- Saint Nick C and Way Of Nash like this
"Men do not shape destiny. Destiny produces the man for the hour."
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:28 PM
#19
ONLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:33 PM
Plus a player as athletic as him will never be nonathletic.
Or remotely close to it imo
33 
#20
OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:02 PM
really because I got out my crystal ball and it said otherwiseLeBron won't lose his athleticism till his late 30's so it doesn't really matter.

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


















